Hi All,
I am working on UAE payroll in standard EOS calculation is happening perfectly.
But how we need to do if employee has unpaid absences in his services. How to get deducted from the employee EOS benefit.
Please guide me achieve the above scenario.
Thanks,
Shaik
Dear Folks,
We are facing a different issue in displaying PF & Pension numbers on payslip.
The issue is while awe are executing the payslip through PY driver that is PC00_M40_CALC both the PF & Pension numbers are not getting displayed and if the same employee payslip executed through CEDT program that is PC00_M40_CEDT both the field values are getting displayed.
FYI, we have already done all the preliminary analysis for several times like Maintaining the infotype record, Selecting the correct form and selecting the correct variant.
We are using the table P0587 & table fields EEPFM & EEPNM for displaying the PF & Pension number.
Request you to please provide your valuable suggestions.
Thanks
Hi.. Experts,
I have few questions from Posting from payroll results to FI, please answer step by step with suitable examples.
Q. Have you involved to Posting from payroll result to FI? What is the use of symbolic account while posting of any wage type amount to GL account?
Q. So why can’t we directly post wage type to GL account, why do we require symbolic account?
Q. Why can we directly map wage type to GL account? Why SAP has given the integration between wage type as a integration point of symbolic account?
Q. Why can’t we directly assign wage type to GL account? We are going to assign wage type to symbolic account and symbolic account to GL Account. Why can’t you need symbolic account in between them?
Q. Can we map one wage type to different GL Accounts? How can we do it in the system?
Waiting for your responses.
thanks,
with regards,
Surendra
Hi All,
I would like to understand if MANAD report can be executed for SAP Brazil Payroll.without implementing SAP FI.
Currently, the FI posting is being done in a third party system and hence, can we run MANAD report using SAP standard in such a scenario?
Kindly advise. Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Vivek Barnwal
Hi All,
While doing posting run 'PC00_M99_CIPE' it says 'Posting Balance is not cleared (Period 06/2014A)'.
Please guide me
Thanks,
Shaik
Hi All,
I want to insert line in Background of Payslip design (PE51 transaction). But am not to find the option to insert.
Please find the attached screen shot reference.
Request guide me
Thanks,
Shaik
Dear Experts,
I have copied the International schema for Nepal Payroll. Regular payroll is working fine But Offcycle payroll is working showing and while execution. kindly find the attached error in offcycle execution:
Initially the error was of ''P0267 was not allowed in respective schema'' that was due to the Function P0267 was not allowed for all country grouping as the characteristic of respective schema is '' * " means for all country groupings. But now the function has been enabled for the same then its displaying the given error.
Kindly Help
Regards
Bindu
Dear Team,
I have one requirement that for some employee I have to maintain daily work schedule as follow
I maintained as follow
I
When I am running pt60 getting this error , Please suggest
Dear team,
I have 2 wage type : transport allowance ( in PA0008) and LTA ( PA0014) . I change this both wage type from 15.01.2015 by decreasing 100. but both are showing different amount .When I analyze I found that for LTA calculating as follow:
Jan 1-14 - 500 (500/31=16.12 per day x 14 days - 225.68)
Jan 15-31 - 400 (400/31= 12.9 per day x 17 days - 219.30)
225.68 + 219.30 = 445.16
But Transport allowance are as follow :
Jan 1-14 - 500 (500/30=16.66 per day x 14 days - 233.33)
Jan 15-31 - 400 (400/30= 13.33 per day x 16 days - 213.33)
233.33+213.33= 446.66
we want to do calculation like in 2nd part . Please suggest
Hi All,
I have the following in schema
IF ZKMO IF: Check for 2016 Tax Year
PIT WKMP P61 NOAB Process KM Re-imbursibves
ENDIF
PIT -KMP P61 NOAB Process KM Re-imbursibves
ZKMO must calculate using rule -KMP if payroll period is less than 01.2017 ( March 2016) ( e.g payroll period 12.2016 =February 2016)
ZKMO must calculate using rule WKMP if payroll period is anything = or greater than 01.2017 ( payroll period 01.2017 March 2016)
Rule ZKMO id defined as below.
D CMPER 1601 "CHECK FOR MARCH 2016
* SCOND=F IF
< SCOND=T IF
When payroll period is 12.2016 ( 01.02.2016 to 28.02.2016) rule in payroll results is as below: Rule is false therefore -KMP rule is used for calculation.
ZKMO * CMPER 1601
ZKMO * * SCOND=F IF
Payroll run for period 01.2017 (01.03.2016 to 31.03.2016) then rule is as below.
Rule ESGPCR VaKey Operation
ZKMO * CMPER 1601
ZKMO * * SCOND=F IF
ENDIF
I expected rule to be True not false so that rule WKMP is used for calculation instead of -KMP. Please assist me fix schema that rule WKMP is used in period 01.2017 onwards and -KMP only used when payroll period is before 01.2017.
Hi All,
I am having a customer requirement which I need your help to Apply on SAP Payroll
The customer wants to set a mobile bill limit for each employee and if the mobile bill from the operator exceeded the employee limit, the employee is charged with the difference from salary
Ex:
1- If the mobile limit is 300 and mobile bill 250 ----> Deduction 0
2- If the mobile limit is 300 and mobile bill 300 ----> Deduction 0
3- If the mobile limit is 300 and mobile bill 500 ----> Deduction 200 (500 minus 300)
Please help me with the steps to implement this requirements
Hi All,
I am Implementing payroll for 8 countries at the same the time for African region. All country has different company codes.Can you help me in below queries.
your advice will be very useful.
Regards,
Kiran
Hi Friends,
I have read many posts on Retroactive Accounting but still here i am trying to understand the practical use of this concept.
Apart from this in IT0003, there are 2 fields which we is being handled manually.
1- Run Payroll up to
2- Do not account after
(Date-1) Run Payroll up to says until when payroll has to continue even the employees status is withdraw, inactive or retiree.
(Date-2) Do not account after states the date when you dnt want to run payroll for withdrawn EE.
In above statement i'd like to know that Date(2) will never be grater than Date (1) bcz EE may be inactive before but there is necessary to credit the salary.
Pls help me to understand this concept.
Regards
Amit
When i am Integrating PLOGI ORGA ="X " for Organizational Management & Personnel Administration in t-code SM30 with "TSS70" in table, cost centre should assign automatically to employee. However, I'm unable to see that assignment done. So could somebody please throw any insights on this issue.
Cheers!!!!
Noor.
Hi friends,
I want to write below tax rules in terms of PCR.
I have 2 tax rules, one for EE tax calculation & another for ER tax calculation.
tax calculation slabs for EE has been written already, screenshort below. If anybody canhelp me to write PCR for ER tax calculation slabs:
Payable -Net IIT taxable income IIT (EE)
<800 0 0
800~3360 =(Payable after tax-800)/0.8 IIT taxable income*0.2
3360~21000 =Payable after tax*0.8/0.84 IIT taxable income*0.2
21000~49500 =(Payable after tax-2000)*0.8/0.76 IIT taxable income*0.3-2000
>49500 =(Payable after tax-7000)*0.8/0.68 IIT taxable income*0.4-7000
PCR for Tax slab for employee, Please help me to write for ER, I have started to write, please help to write further. I have not worked on schemas
Dear team,
off-cycle simulation posting run creating no document. Please let me know what will be possible reason
Thanks
Dear Team ,
requirement is to calculate Every Month Flat 30 Days Calculation in Payroll. For spe
I 
Can you please tell me that what should I do so that it will work as expected as right now its dividing by 31 for jan
Thanks
Hi Experts.
I want to learn international payroll..
Can anyone provide configuration document please.
Regards
Sri
We have a situation, where the Off-cycle deduction wage types ( from ITY 0267) are not taken during off-cycle Payroll run for Advance Leave Payments ( Off cycle reasons 0801 & 0802).
We have two different wage types (one for Off-Cycle Run only and Once for Regular Run Only)
We found that Advance leave payment is used as regular payroll run and the Regular Wage types from ITY 0015 are taken instead of Off-cycle Wage types from ITY 0267.
The end user need to take Off-cycle wage type from ITY 0267 during the off-cycle payroll run for Advance Leave Payments ( Off cycle reasons 0801 & 0802).
Kindly advice, how we can solve this issue.
Dear team,
I am facing issue regarding advance leave payment , Its working fine for basic salary but client requirement is to deduct LTA ( which is maintained in IT0014 with prcl= 80 is 1 ) and GOSI deduction ( /261 prcl 80 = 1) .
Issue :
1. I am able to add LTA for current month working days but not for leave period
2. Not able to deduct GOSI for working and leave period both
Please suggest
Thanks
